Biden administration report: Israel's use of US-supplied weapons in Gaza could violate international law

Biden Government Report: Israel's Use of US-Provided Weapons in Gaza May Violate International Law

« `html

An overwhelming majority of the world's nations voted with the Palestinians at the United Nations today, but who were the nine countries that voted against the Palestinian quest for UN membership, rights and privileges, and why? Notably, Israel, the United States, Hungary, Argentina, the Czech Republic, and several Pacific island nations have supported Israel for various reasons ranging from mutual interests to soft power diplomacy.

The geopolitical context

The recent assembly at the UN shed light on the complex geopolitical alliances and motivations behind each country's vote. Israel, naturally, has opposed recognition of a Palestinian state, a position reinforced by the October 7 attacks by Hamas. The United States, despite ongoing tensions between President Joe Biden and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, also voted against it, citing a preference for a two-state solution negotiated directly between the parties involved.

Unexpected alliances

Countries like Hungary and Argentina have expressed support for Israel, each for their own reasons. Hungary, under the leadership of Prime Minister Orban, sees Israel as a strategic ally, while Argentina, under the new populist presidency of Javier Milei, has pledged unwavering support for Israel. Their support reflects a combination of political and personal interests aligned with those of Israel.

The role of Pacific island nations

Pacific island nations, such as Micronesia, Papua New Guinea, Nauru and Palau, voted with Israel, mainly due to the soft power diplomacy exercised by Israel. These small developing states benefit from generous aid from Israel, which includes support during natural disasters and investments in their infrastructure. In return, they support Israel in international forums, emphasizing how humanitarian aid can also serve as an effective diplomatic tool.

These complex dynamics within the UN reveal how international relations and national interests shape countries' positions on issues as sensitive as recognition of Palestinian statehood.

Why these votes are significant

The votes against recognition of a Palestinian state at the UN highlight not only global geopolitical divisions but also the varied diplomatic strategies employed by Israel to secure international support. From traditional diplomacy to more nuanced soft power approaches, Israel has managed to forge strategic alliances beyond its usual circle of Western support.

Furthermore, the United States' position continues to play a crucial role in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, acting as a barometer of future peace prospects. The relationship between the United States and Israel, although complex, remains a central pillar of American foreign policy in the Middle East.

The decision of these countries to vote with Israel reaffirms the importance of political and economic alliances, as well as shared values, in shaping national foreign policies. It also highlights the power of soft power diplomacy in modern international relations.


The UN vote on the Palestinian issue clearly illustrates the geopolitical fault lines and strategic alliances that continue to shape the global political landscape. While the path to peace remains fraught with challenges, understanding the motivations behind each country's support can offer valuable insights into the possibilities for future conflict resolution.


Charles Foucault From

Charles Foucault

“Charles Foucault” is a fictional character created by the team, embodying an experienced and dedicated journalist, born in the 50s in Paris. This character, from a modest family, was designed to represent passion and dedication for journalism from a young age, initially writing for the school newspaper before pursuing a university degree in journalism.

Although "Charles Foucault" is not a real person, his fictional story is used to illustrate the journey of a committed journalist, covering significant events such as natural disasters and political conflicts. “Charles” is presented as a daring reporter, bringing professionalism and a unique perspective to readers.

Articles published under the name "Charles Foucault" are the result of a collective effort by our editorial team, who share a commitment to quality journalism, in-depth coverage of world events, and compelling storytelling. Through this character, aims to offer insightful and well-informed reporting, enriching its readers' understanding of various current affairs topics.